TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Essays - Hypothesis Testing

OBJECTIVE 1 TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Dependent Variable:observation SourceType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Corrected Model239892.700a926654.7442.887.023 Intercept424116.3001424116.30045.930.000 blocks137360.867434340.2173.719.020 treatment84800.833184800.8339.184.007 blocks * treatment17731.00044432.750.480.750 Error184678.000209233.900 Total848687.00030 Corrected Total424570.70029 a. R Squared = .565 (Adjusted R Squared = .369) We find there is no significant difference between blocks and treatments since its significant value 0.750 is greater than 0.05 We find out there is a significant difference between treatments(urgents) since 0.007 significant value is less than the p-value of 0.05. Thou we could not run the post-hoc test since we had 2 treatments. We find there is a significant difference between the blocks(concentration) as its significant value is 0.02 is less than the p-value of 0.05 thus we run the LSD tests to determine the difference Post Hoc Tests concentration MULTIPLE COMPARISONS observation LSD (I) concentration(J) concentrationMean Difference (I-J)Std. ErrorSig.95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound c1c246.6755.479.410-69.06162.39 c3116.33*55.479.049.61232.06 c4145.50*55.479.01629.77261.23 c5187.83*55.479.00372.11303.56 c2c1-46.6755.479.410-162.3969.06 c369.6755.479.224-46.06185.39 c498.8355.479.090-16.89214.56 c5141.17*55.479.01925.44256.89 c3c1-116.33*55.479.049-232.06-.61 c2-69.6755.479.224-185.3946.06 c429.1755.479.605-86.56144.89 c571.5055.479.212-44.23187.23 c4c1-145.50*55.479.016-261.23-29.77 c2-98.8355.479.090-214.5616.89 c3-29.1755.479.605-144.8986.56 c542.3355.479.454-73.39158.06 c5c1-187.83*55.479.003-303.56-72.11 c2-141.17*55.479.019-256.89-25.44 c3-71.5055.479.212-187.2344.23 c4-42.3355.479.454-158.0673.39 Based on observed means. The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 9233.900. *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. NB Those with the significant value (p-value) less than 0.05 are significantly different FINDING C1 is different from C3,C4 and C5 C2 is different from C5 C3 is different from C1 C4 is different from C1 C5 IS different from C1 and C2 Estimated Marginal Means urgent Dependent Variable:observation urgentMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound salt172.06728.443113.805230.328 vinegar65.73328.4437.472123.995 2. concentration Dependent Variable:observation concentrationMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound c1218.16739.230136.335299.999 c2171.50039.23089.668253.332 c3101.83339.23020.001183.665 c472.66739.230-9.165154.499 c530.33339.230-51.499112.165 OBJECTIVE 2 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:observation SourceType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Corrected Model232457.500a546491.5005.808.001 Intercept424116.3001424116.30052.983.000 time133719.800266859.9008.353.002 treatment84800.833184800.83310.594.003 time * treatment13936.86726968.433.871.432 Error192113.200248004.717 Total848687.00030 Corrected Total424570.70029 a. R Squared = .548 (Adjusted R Squared = .453) We find there is no significance difference between time and treatment since its significance value is 0.432 which is greater than 0.05. We find out there is a significant difference between treatments(urgents) since 0.003 significant value is less than the p-value of 0.05. Thou we could not run the post-hoc test since we had 2 treatments. We find out there is a significant difference between time since 0.002 significant value is less than the p-value of 0.05. Thus we run the post-hoc test to find the difference Post Hoc Tests weeks Multiple Comparisons observation LSD (I) weeks(J) weeksMean Difference (I-J)Std. ErrorSig.95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound week 1week 2-114.70*40.012.008-197.28-32.12 week 3-158.30*40.012.001-240.88-75.72 week 2week 1114.70*40.012.00832.12197.28 week 3-43.6040.012.287-126.1838.98 week 3week 1158.30*40.012.00175.72240.88 week 243.6040.012.287-38.98126.18 Based on observed means. The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 8004.717. *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. NB Those with the significant value less than 0.05 are significantly different FINDING Week1 is different from week2 and week3 Week2 is different from week1 Week3 is different from week1 Estimated Marginal Means 1. weeks Dependent Variable:observation weeksMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound week 127.90028.293-30.49386.293 week 2142.60028.29384.207200.993 week 3186.20028.293127.807244.593 PRESERVATIVES Dependent Variable:observation urgentMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound salt172.06728.443113.805230.328 vinegar65.73328.4437.472123.995

Free Essays on Gender In The Work Of Perrault

Gender in the Work of Perrault The fairy tales of Charles Perrault exhibit an inherent set of gender specific social values instilled in his major characters. These values are what set the guidelines for the creation of his morality tale; they define the attributes that his characters are designed to exemplify. Perrault’s leading female characters, specifically, seem to be held under the rigid societal construct that is â€Å"model female behavior† as defined by civilità ©. Civilità © is the institution that defined 17th century France. Civilità © is the code of behavior developed by Louis XIV and the French aristocracy as an attempt to give the people of France a uniform set of social norms that would be consistent with the standards of Louis XIV’s court. This code consisted of social guidelines to which the model citizen would adhere. Civilità © as it pertained to women stressed beauty, grace, politeness, obedience, docility, and purity (virginity). A woman that adheres to the code of civilità © is perfectly groomed, an artful conversationalist, and completely reserved (in control of any urges). 17th century France saw the women of the aristocracy abide strongly by the principles set forth by civilità ©. Perrault was influential to these women as he was a strong purveyor of the code of civilità © through his fairy tales. Every day women of the aristocracy would convene in literary salons to recite fairy tales, and in doing so reinforce the principles of civilità © that these tales conveyed. These tales did not function only to entertain, they were full of underlying social values (civilità ©) and implied political commentary. The setting alone of these meetings was overtly laced with civilità ©; women would adorn themselves in expensive garments, prime themselves to physical perfection (or as close to perfection as possible), and use their superior conversation skills to convey their fairy tales as artfully as possible. No... Free Essays on Gender In The Work Of Perrault Free Essays on Gender In The Work Of Perrault Gender in the Work of Perrault The fairy tales of Charles Perrault exhibit an inherent set of gender specific social values instilled in his major characters. These values are what set the guidelines for the creation of his morality tale; they define the attributes that his characters are designed to exemplify. Perrault’s leading female characters, specifically, seem to be held under the rigid societal construct that is â€Å"model female behavior† as defined by civilità ©. Civilità © is the institution that defined 17th century France. Civilità © is the code of behavior developed by Louis XIV and the French aristocracy as an attempt to give the people of France a uniform set of social norms that would be consistent with the standards of Louis XIV’s court. This code consisted of social guidelines to which the model citizen would adhere. Civilità © as it pertained to women stressed beauty, grace, politeness, obedience, docility, and purity (virginity). A woman that adheres to the code of civilità © is perfectly groomed, an artful conversationalist, and completely reserved (in control of any urges). 17th century France saw the women of the aristocracy abide strongly by the principles set forth by civilità ©. Perrault was influential to these women as he was a strong purveyor of the code of civilità © through his fairy tales. Every day women of the aristocracy would convene in literary salons to recite fairy tales, and in doing so reinforce the principles of civilità © that these tales conveyed. These tales did not function only to entertain, they were full of underlying social values (civilità ©) and implied political commentary. The setting alone of these meetings was overtly laced with civilità ©; women would adorn themselves in expensive garments, prime themselves to physical perfection (or as close to perfection as possible), and use their superior conversation skills to convey their fairy tales as artfully as possible. No...